3 - PCDmis portlocks forsale

[Matthew D. Hoedeman]

Originally Posted by J Jones

Do you believe that new EULA's can be retroactive and also do you think posting a EULA on a website binds a person that installs a software product that they bought that does not require EULA agreement acceptance to install?

I do not think they can be made retroactive. For example (but maybe not a GOOD one) look at seatbelt laws. Cars made before the law were enacted are exempt from the law, unless they WERE made with seatbelts (some were, some were not).

[FieldTech]

Actually no I do not, and I do not agree with attempting to disallow transferring software license. Also as long as these are used as is without needing to update SMA the point is moot IMO.

That said if the SMA needs to be updated then HEX will have a say. As for #3 I honestly doubt the 2010 date. But again, if reading the programmed modules in V3.5 or later indicates the dongle is "3.25 Enabled" then yes 2010 is either legitimate or a legitimate mistake made during last SMA update.

Originally Posted by J Jones

Do you believe that new EULA's can be retroactive and also do you think posting a EULA on a website binds a person that installs a software product that they bought that does not require EULA agreement acceptance to install?